In one dispute, the administration wants to end the controversial Trump-era "Remain in Mexico" policy, which requires asylum seekers at the southern US border to wait in Mexico until their applications are processed.Īnother case deals with the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate greenhouse gases, raising legal questions about the agency's powers. The court is also set to issue decisions concerning climate and immigration policy in significant cases that haven't attracted as much national attention but could influence President Joe Biden's domestic agenda. The coach, Joseph Kennedy, argues the school district violated his First Amendment rights, though the school district says his conduct pressured children to join in prayer and may be perceived as a government endorsement of religion. The other case concerns a former high-school football coach in Washington state who lost his job for praying on the 50-yard line after games. A Supreme Court decision in their favor could clear the way for state governments to use taxpayer dollars to pay for religious schools, narrowing the separation of church and state and bolstering the school-choice movement largely propped up by the religious right. The challengers, two Maine families, say the rule violates their First Amendment rights to exercise religion freely. The state seeks to maintain a "religiously neutral" public education, in line with the First Amendment that the government should not promote religion. One case involves a Maine program that prohibits using taxpayer money to cover tuition fees at private schools that offer religious instruction. In two current cases, the conservative justices may once again deliver victories to religious-freedom advocates. The court's newly expanded 6-3 conservative majority has shown a tendency to protect religious liberties. Should those laws fall, gun-safety advocates worry that more firearms will be brought into public spaces as gun violence increases nationwide. In addition to New York, at least seven other states, representing about 73 million people, have similar concealed-carry licensing rules. Chief Justice John Roberts at the time noted that the draft didn't represent a final ruling, but court watchers say the conservative majority is likely to take that direction, which would dramatically reshape the law and deepen political divides.ĭuring oral arguments in November, the conservative justices seemed open to strike down the New York law as unconstitutional - an outcome that would for the first time expand Americans' rights to carry a gun in public. Last month's leaked draft opinion on the case showed the Supreme Court may side with Mississippi and toss out abortion rights, sending shock waves through the nation. Wade, the landmark decision that legalized abortion at the federal level nearly 50 years ago. Mississippi has asked the justices to overturn Roe v. The most consequential case before the nation's highest court is about abortion. A handful of them are high-profile disputes, poised to have dramatic implications and unleash widespread public reaction. The court is set to release two dozen rulings by the end of June or early July before it recesses for summer. It often indicates a user profile.Īs a blockbuster Supreme Court term nears its end, the justices are expected to roll out highly anticipated decisions on abortion, guns, and religion that could drastically shake up American law - and life. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |